Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Proposed Penal Reforms Point to Return of ‘Renewed’ GULAG, Novaya Gazeta Says



Paul Goble

            Staunton, May 24 – Moscow has taken great pride in the fact that the number of Russians incarcerated in its penal system has fallen in recent years, but it has not stressed two current shortcomings of the system: the number of prisoners per 100,000 (434) remains vastly higher than most countries and the number of recidivists has doubled over the last decade.

            Nor have regime media outlets pointed out that current proposals for reform instead of making things better will lead to a situation in which Russia’s prisons “will very much resemble a renwed variant of the GULAG,” according to Aleksey Kozlov and Olga Romanova of Novaya gazeta (novayagazeta.ru/articles/2017/05/24/72542-strana-otmotala-sto-let-lagerey).

            They offer that conclusion at the end of a long article today which begins by quotimg Aleksand Auzan, the dean of the economics faculty at Moscow State University who says that present-day Russian society “educates the individual in three institutions: the school, the army and the jail.”

            The first two are important, but the third is far more significant than many think.  If one counts not only the number of Russians who have passed through the prison system but also their families, friends, police, court officials and jailors, “almost half of the population of Russia is one way or another connected to prison,” Kozlov and Romanova say.

            “And what is the prison teaching them at present?  It is teaching them to lie and to conform. To give bribes to get out early … to avoid contradicting the authorities and to avoid showing any initiative and to be a cog in the system.”  And it is also teaching those who go through it to have contempt for the rules and the rulers.

            “More than that,” they continue, “besides faith in the state and in other people, prison also takes away from the individual his future, that which he could have after being freed.” And it does nothing to help him in that direction while incarcerated, having failed to provide prisoners with any useful training or habits for life outside the walls.

            Prison officials say that what they do in the camps is because there is no other way to establish order. “But this isn’t the case,” the journalists say. What is needed for order is a complex system of infrastructure and rules that promote different outcomes than the ones being promoted at present.

            Most of the prisons and colonies in Russia are antiquated: according to the penal system itself, 80 percen tof them need “immediate reconstruction.”  Fifty-two of them don’t have plumbing, most are horrifically overcrowded, and few correspond even to Russian let alone European standards of hygiene.’

            Those who work are paid so little that they have to turn to criminal authorities within the jails for the most basic needs. But that pattern means that they are quickly recruited into the ranks of those who commit more serious and violent crimes.  There was some progress against this practice in 2011 when first timers and recidivists were separated. But little else.

            A great deal of additional money is needed to address all these problems, but more important, the two journalists say, but more important are fundamental structural reforms.  Those are not being proposed by the penal administration. Instead, all of its proposals suggest that they will end by creating “a renewed version of [Stalin’s] GULAG.”

            Under the proposed changes, prisoners will lose control over where they are sent – often distant from their families – what they are employed to work on and how much they will receive.  Moreover, the already inadequate medical care the prisoners now receive will become even worse.

            And such an arrangement just as it did earlier will cast a dark shadow on Russia’s future, quite possibly making it impossible for Russia to reform and at the very least placing burdens on it that will add to the difficulties its citizens now must bear. 

Implicitly Acknowledging Support for Putin May Be Slipping, Kremlin Drops Its 70-70 Plan



Paul Goble

            Staunton, May 24 – In an implicit acknowledgement that public support for Vladimir Putin may be soft and in fact falling, Andrey Yarin who heads the domestic politics section of the Presidential Administration, says that getting 70 percent of Russians to take part in the upcoming presidential elections and 70 percent support for Putin are no longer priorities.

            Yarin made that declaration to a conference of the Foundation for the Development of Civil Society earlier this week. His remarks on this score were relayed by two participants in that meeting to Elena Mukhametshina, a Vedomosti journalist, who published them in her paper yesterday (vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/05/23/691209-kremlyu-formula).

            Up until now, the journalist says, sources in the Presidential Administration “have spoken about the necessity of achieving 70 percent participation [in the elections] and 70 percent support [for Putin].” But now, Yarin is saying that the Kremlin expects to do that well and so is focusing on other aspects of the situation.

            The Kremlin’s confidence may be justified given the various administrative measures at its disposal and the ability of Putin to set the agenda by actions he has or more take. But to retreat from the 70 and 70 formula suggests that the Kremlin is either lowballing the situation to make a Putin victory look better or preparing for lower levels of participation and support.

Khimki Crowd Assembles to Show Support for Arrested Long-Haul Truckers



Paul Goble

            Staunton, May 24 – Russian officials, disturbed by the appearance of a crowd of supporters of the long-haul truckers police arrested in Khimki near Moscow on Sunday, not only organized a late-night court session to fine the three strike leaders but hustled off to some unknown location the nine others.  Their fate is as yet unknown.

            After the three were released following the imposition of fines ranging from 10,500 to 30,500 rubles (200 to 600 US dollars), they spoke to the crowd and detailed the inhuman conditions in which they had been kept (activatica.org/blogs/view/id/3507/title/s-zaderzhannymi-dalnoboyshchikami-proishodyat-strannosti).

            The strike leaders indicated that despite the fines, the truckers were going ahead with plans to establish a second location in the Moscow region for striking truckers to park and provide mutual support.  And they said they would press for the release of the nine others who were scheduled to face a judge on Monday morning but did not appear before him.

            The fact that the detained drivers attracted a crowd of local supporters and journalists has made it more difficult for the authorities to “fabricate cases and condemn innocent people,” the Activatica portal says.

            Another indication of the Russian authorities’ nervousness about the long-haul drivers’ strike yesterday when the Duma took up a measure that would extend the blocking of messenger services like Zello that the drivers have used to organize the strike over the last two months (mk.ru/politics/2017/05/24/gosduma-predlozhila-puskat-v-messendzhery-po-pasportu-i-cenzurirovat-ikh.html).